Archives for category: Coyote Hills

Coyote Hills

Planning Commission Hearing, Thursday, October 22, 7:00 p.m., City Hall Chambers, 303 West Commonwealth Avenue, Fullerton

Did you vote against Measure W three years ago, assuming that it would stop Chevron from building 760 homes on Coyote Hills? Think again. The good news is that nothing has been built there yet. The bad news is that Measure W’s one year hold on proposing a new development has expired, and the city government is pretending that the land is still zoned for building, making the land much more expensive to purchase.

Three years of talks following Chevron’s massive defeat at the polls in 2012 have yielded a new development plan application that simply pushes all of the homes to one side, with a relatively short window of time for phased acquisition to preserve it all instead of building anything. Same number of car trips, and more water for more houses. Oh, and the price for buying it all hasn’t even been established, and won’t be available until a month after Thursday night’s meeting.

The Friends of Coyote Hills, who gathered the signatures to overturn Chevron’s development agreement, resulting in Measure W, are waiting to see the assessed value of the land before taking a position on this new plan before the Planning Commission on Oct. 22. Show up Thursday night (yes, a special meeting night) to ask the Planning Commission why they can’t wait until the land value appraisal is available at the end of November to consider this application, and to ask why the City of Fullerton is ignoring the fact that Chevron’s development approvals were overturned by the referendum three years ago. And while you’re there, ask them why are we building more houses when we are cutting back on our own water use?

Coyote Hills Phasing Plan

More details can be found in the following letter, issued by the Friends of Coyote Hills this morning:

“Dear Friend,

Please attend the Fullerton Planning Commission Hearing tomorrow evening at 7 PM at Fullerton City Hall.We all need to let them know this application for a development tract map (Vesting Tentative Tract Map – VTTM) including the acquisition agreement is not ready for a decision by the City. Based on the Study Session last week, we are not supportive of this plan because it is shaping up to not be a feasible acquisition plan.

1The acquisition agreement greatly favors Chevron and development.
We would far rather be on the seller than buyer end of this transaction. The appraisal for the site is based on “highest and best use” as if the 2012 referendum never occurred. When we were in initial discussion with Chevron over acquisition, even they acknowledged Measure W casts a cloud over the status of the land.  Now nearly 3 years later and for the very first time (we’ve asked and asked and have not received an answer until now), the City is formally stating its position on Measure W and saying it was meaningless: none of the development approvals were overturned by it. In other words, it is giving Chevron the greenlight to appraise the land for acquisition as if it was approved for housing.

2Appraisals for most of the site has yet to be complete by 11/30/2015, and yet there is a rush to give Chevron vested right to develop now. Why would the City sign up to purchase land without knowing the sale price, especially when the appraisals are so close to being complete? Is the appraisal going to be so astronomical that acquisition would be virtually impossible? Why not wait until after the appraisal in November to make a decision on the VTTM? Would you sign a legal document to buy a house without knowing its price?

3The timeline allowed for acquisition fundraising is too short – only 1 year for probably an astronomical price (see our point above about the unfinished appraisal).

4After all is said and done with this agreement, there is nothing in it that commits the City to acquiring anything at all. That is a future and separate decision by the City Council over which we have no control. We been been patiently cooperating for an acquisition.  The City Council can decide to acquire nothing after this VTTM approval. At best, after they see the final appraisal (our point #2 above), they will probably not want to go beyond acquiring the token neighborhood 1.

When we set out on this plan for acquisition, we asked for a feasible shot at acquiring all of the West Coyote Hills for a park. The offer before us is definitely not that. As we said above, we’d much rather be the seller than buyer in this transaction. The agreement is that tilted in favor of the seller. Our City leaders must not approve a plan with a TBD price to be filled in later.

Please do plan to attend the Hearing tomorrow. Your presence at the Public Meeting spoke volumes! We need to continue to show up and speak up at the Hearing.

Planning Commission Hearing
Thursday, 10/22/15, 7 PM
Fullerton City Hall
303 West Commonwealth Avenue
Fullerton, CA 92832

Thank you for your continued support,
Friends of Coyote Hills”

Nature Park or Housing Development?

Nature Park or Housing Development?

There is a Public Information Session about the current development and/or acquisition plan for West Coyote Hills at City Hall tonight, October 14, 7:00 p.m. A full hearing before the Fullerton Planning Commission will take place next week, on Thursday, October 22.

Readers will recall that in 2012 the Chevron’s plans to develop West Coyote Hills were thwarted by the defeat of Measure W by over 61% of Fullerton’s voters, who didn’t like the prospect of 760 new homes being built on the last remaining open space in North Orange County. Immediately following the defeat, Chevron’s Pacific Coast Homes representative announced, for the first time, that Chevron would be a “willing seller” of the property. Negotiations commenced, but moved slowly.

Tonight’s meeting reflects the results of over two years of these negotiations between the Friends of Coyote Hills, Pacific Coast Homes, and the City of Fullerton. The group Friends of Coyote Hills, however, has not yet approved the plan. The plan is a phased tract map that would cede some land immediately to the city, but allow for development of successive areas of the property, unless they can be purchased from Chevron within specified time periods. It represents a risk for anyone who wants to see all of the land preserved. And, as with any plan, the devil is in the details. Check out the plans below the story, and try to make it to the meeting for more information.

From the Friends of Coyote Hills…

“The long awaited park proposal is coming up for a formal public review and then Fullerton City Planning Commission Hearing for a vote. This is a complex formal Development Proposal contingent on an offer by Chevron-Pacific Coast Homes to first allow the City an option to purchase West Coyote Hills for a park. If funds cannot be raised by a deadline, then the property can be developed as approved under this proposal.

The Friends of Coyote Hills has provided limited input to this proposal at a high level. We have discussed a funding model with funding sources and target amounts with the City to achieve the acquisition. Anticipating a high purchase price, we modeled the acquisition in phases over 3 (aggressive and high risk) to 5 (more realistic and moderate risk) years. In preparation for the upcoming public meeting and Hearing, we are reviewing the detailed terms of Chevron’s offer with our legal counsel. We will share our finding and recommendations in the coming days and weeks.

Please do plan to attend these 2 very important events to weigh in on the proposal for West Coyote Hills. Keep in mind, there will be a formal vote by the City at the Hearing.”

Public Information Session
Wednesday, 10/14/15, 7 PM
Fullerton Community Center (Across from City Hall)
340 West Commonwealth AvenueFullerton, CA 92832

Planning Commission Hearing
Thursday, 10/22/15, 7 PM
Fullerton City Hall

The detailed proposal is available on the Fullerton City Website:

Staff Reports for October meeting/hearing (see the “Attachment 2 – Exhibit A – Conditions of Approval”, Section L for the Acquisition Agreement)

Appraisal (only available for part of the site, with remaining appraisal TBD)

Environmental Report Addendum

Vesting Tract Map

Fullerton rings in the New Year

Fullerton rings in the New Year

As a rule, I dislike end of the year wrap-up stories, so let’s take a quick look at just a few things Fullerton has to look forward to, and to look out for, in 2015…

New Mayor

2014 ended with recently re-elected Fullerton Mayor Pro Tem Greg Sebourn being elected to serve as Mayor for 2015 by his colleagues on the Council.  Councilmember Jennifer Fitzgerald, who works for Orange County’s most prominent lobbying firm, takes over as Mayor Pro Tem.  Mayor Sebourn survived a particularly sleazy negative campaign organized and paid for by the Fullerton Police Officers Association during election season, so we shouldn’t expect to see particularly warm relations between the police and the Mayor’s office. The police needn’t worry much, however, because they still have a compliant Council majority in the form of Councilmembers Fitzgerald, Chaffee, and Flory, and most of the city’s power resides in the office of the City Manager anyway.

New Planning Director

Fullerton has a new Director of Community Development after an extraordinary two and a half year vacancy. Local resident Karen Haluza, who recently served as Interim Director of Santa Ana’s planning department began her new position this past month. On the positive side, Ms. Haluza vocally opposed the awful Amerige Court plan when it was first approved several years ago. On the negative side, she endorsed Measure W, which would have allowed Chevron’s Pacific Coast Homes plan for Coyote Hills to go forward in 2012. Three-fifths of Fullerton voters disagreed with her, soundly defeating that plan, but another is in the works.

New Way to Elect City Council Members?

Two-time City Council candidate Vivian “Kitty” Jaramillo has filed a lawsuit against the City of Fullerton, contending that Latino residents are disenfranchised by the city’s current practice of electing five at-large Councilmembers. Relief would presumably be found in an election-by-district system, where residents would vote for candidates to represent only their district among five (or more?) in the city. Arguments can be made over what system might best serve voters, or whether or not a problem even exists to correct.

New Police Officers and Promotions

The Fullerton Police Department has filled out its ranks by hiring ten new officers. Several others have been promoted to critical positions of leadership as veteran captains have retired.

Old Police Lawsuits

The Rag knows of two current lawsuits against the Fullerton Police Department. The first is the one filed by Ron Thomas over the beating death of his son Kelly at the hands of Fullerton police in 2011. A suit filed by Kelly Thomas’ mother was settled in 2012. Since no one was ever held legally responsible for killing Kelly Thomas (a jury found the officers charged in his death innocent), it may be harder for his father to collect any monetary settlement from the City of Fullerton.

The other lawsuit was filed in 2014, and alleges that a Fullerton police detective coerced sex from a woman during, and in the aftermath of, a child custody case. We’ll have to wait and see whether this lawsuit goes to trial, is dismissed, or is settled out of court. In any case, is that detective still working for the department?

New Body Cameras for Police Officers

All Fullerton police officers are expected to begin wearing body cameras this year, but it remains to be seen whether or not video recordings of contacts with the public will resolve conflicts any better than the already required audio recorders, which can mysteriously malfunction or be turned off. Officers should be seriously disciplined for deactivating cameras, and members of the public should not be prevented from making their own recordings of officer encounters.

New Drought Tolerant Landscaping for City Hall

The lawn in front of City Hall will come out sometime this year, and be replaced by some form of drought tolerant landscape. Let’s hope it becomes a showcase for California’s lush, leafy, green native plants, and not just a giant cactus garden. If Fullerton residents are going to remove their water hungry lawns in favor of drought tolerant landscaping, they need to see something more attractive than spiny succulents. And ditch the decomposed granite, there is nothing wrong with dirt.

(Even More) New High Density Housing

Everywhere, unless the people of Fullerton stand up to City Hall’s plans for more and more mixed-use retail/housing behemoths wherever they can be squeezed in. City Hall wants new tax revenues, but without additional public transportation options or long term local jobs, residents can expect to see more and more traffic on major streets and cut-through traffic in otherwise quiet neighborhoods. Watch out for what may be planned to cast a permanent shadow over your house.

New Assemblymember

Young Kim will take office as the new Assemblymember representing the 65th District, displacing Sharon Quirk-Silva, whose prospects for re-election were doomed by a dismal Democratic voter turnout last November. Ms. Kim’s campaign consisted largely of promising to protect Proposition 13 and something or other about being business-friendly. Not much to work with, really. And let’s not forget that she is a carpetbagger who moved into the district to run for office. Probably not much to look forward to from her, but we’ll see…