Archives for posts with tag: Fullerton City Councl
Amerige-Heights-8A

Follow Mayor Jennifer Fitzgerald’s lucky star to find her in the middle of a district that is somehow not majority Asian American.

In our previous story, the Rag noted that the awful Map # 8A is the only one of the final four District Elections Maps that manages to create a district in the Amerige Heights area that is not majority Asian. It’s quite an accomplishment, given the largely Korean-American population of Amerige Heights and the surrounding area, but somehow the bar owners, or whoever actually drew this map, came out with a district, numbered 1 on their map, that is less than half Asian. The entire reason for establishing district maps in the first place was to settle a lawsuit brought on behalf of Asian and Latino voters, who claimed they were not represented on the council under the current at-large system of electing council members.

The other three maps all have an Asian majority in the Northwest region of the city because they don’t include gratuitous finger of land trickling into the downtown area eastward. Map # 8A, proffered by the downtown bar owners to split up Downtown Fullerton’s voting residents in order to preserve their party-town, also lessens the chances of an Asian-American member being elected to the Fullerton City Council. Conveniently enough, this district is where Mayor Jennifer Fitzgerald lives. She, like Council member Greg Sebourn, will have the opportunity on June 7 to vote for a map that gerrymanders their own homes into districts that increase the likelihood of their own re-elections. Is this what the plaintiffs had in mind when they sued the city to create a fairer system of elections?

On June 7 Mayor Fitzgerald and her fellow council members may claim that they are being objective when they vote for a final district elections map to put before the voters in November, but some of them have already compromised the process by discussing the locations of their own residences while deliberating the issue. Giving the terrible Map # 8A any serious consideration at all is enough to make voters question the motives of city council members. The credibility of all members of the Fullerton City Council will depends on who they listen to on June 7. This map should be crumpled up and tossed into the recycle bin.

One possible district map.

One possible district map.

As readers may know, Fullerton is attempting to settle two lawsuits brought over the lack of diversity on our city council by agreeing to put the question of district-based elections before the voters in 2016. If the lawsuit’s plaintiffs like the result of the election, they’ll drop the suits. But first, the city government has to figure out what kind of district model to put before the voters. How many districts should there be? And where should the lines be drawn? And how do we expect people who are supposedly disenfranchised by a majority of voters to prevail in an election to give them more power when the oppressive majority could easily defeat the measure just by doing what it always does, voting to keep it’s own hegemony?

Back to the process…

Instead of putting several models of improved democracy before the voters, city leaders plan to produce a single one, and hope it passes. (And who is to say you can’t come up with a better plan and put it on the ballot too?). To that end, they’ve hired Compass Demographics to meet with residents, and come up with the fairest plan of them all. You can meet directly with David Ely of Compass on the following dates at the following times and tell him what you think we ought to do.

From the City of Fullerton’s press release….

Mr. Ely will be happy to see you at any of these four meetings:

• Wednesday, November 4, 2015 – 6:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m. at Orangethorpe United Methodist Church – 2351 West Orangethorpe Avenue

• Saturday, November 7, 2015 – 10:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. at Hope International University – 2500 East Nutwood Avenue

• Tuesday, November 10, 2015 – 6:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m. at Maple Neighborhood Center – Lemon Park, 701 South Lemon

• Saturday, November 14, 2015 – 10:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. at Sunny Hills High School – 1801 Warburton Way

According to the City’s press release, “Translators will be present to assist with language needs in Spanish, Korean, Chinese and Vietnamese.

R.S.V.P.’s are requested, but not required, to help plan for the number of attendees and translation needs. For more information or to R.S.V.P., please email districtelections@cityoffullerton.com or call Lucinda Williams, City Clerk at (714) 738-6355.”

Bair-at-Mic

A lawsuit just filed in federal court alleges that a now ex-Detective Ronald Bair, of the Fullerton Police Department, demanded sexual favors from a woman in exchange for favorable testimony in a child custody case. The OC Weekly’s Gabriel San Roman summarizes the suit in a September 15 article.

The plaintiff is suing not only the Fullerton Police Department, but also the City of Fullerton and FPD officers who, she alleges, mishandled her complaint against Det. Bair, and “inappropriately, told police detective Ronald Bair about the anonymous complaint, by the plaintiff,” exposing the plaintiff to retaliatory actions against her. The text of the lawsuit is very disturbing, and paints a picture of a vulnerable woman in the midst of a painful custody process who is abused by an officer of the law.

The lawsuit details several alleged instances of sex between Det. Bair and the plaintiff, acts that she claims she felt forced to perform. According to the suit, she eventually told therapists about the alleged abuse, then attempted to make an anonymous complaint against Det. Bair to the FPD.

The lawsuit states:

“Shortly thereafter, detective RONALD BAIR called the plaintiff and threatened her and said that she was going to die.  It was obvious that he had been told, by the other defendants, about her ‘anonymous’ complaint about his conduct.  He told the plaintiff that he knew that she had a court hearing coming up and that the plaintiff would never see my daughter again.  He told the plaintiff that his police buddies would come after her.”

The Fullerton Police Department is not saying why Ronald Bair no longer works for them, but he did in 2013 when the alleged violations, including forced oral sex, are alleged to have occurred. Unlike the cases of the beating death of Kelly Thomas and the serial sexual assaults by former officer Rincon, the actions alleged in this lawsuit are said to have taken place during the tenure  of current Fullerton Police Chief Danny Hughes.

Mr. San Ramon’s OC Weekly story helpfully includes a link to an October 2012 story from the now defunct Friends for Fullerton’s Future blog, showing then-Detective Bair speaking during the public comments period of a Fullerton City Council meeting in October of 2012. He demands phone and text records from Council member Bruce Whitaker and then-Council member Travis Kiger, alleging that they had been texting during meetings in volition of the Brown Act—a charge vehemently denied by Mr. Whitaker at the time. Recall that these broadcast allegations took place just prior to the November 2012 City Council elections, when Fullerton’s police union was spending tens of thousands of dollars in a desperate attempt to defeat at least one of these council members and install more compliant candidates in their place. Who knows how much influence Det. Bair’s televised and evidently baseless accusations made in the 29 vote margin that elected Jan Flory, endorsed by the police union, over incumbent Travis Kiger, targeted for defeat by the union? The election of Ms. Flory put an end to any serious discussion of Civilian Police Oversight in Fullerton during the ensuring two years.

If Fullerton had a robust and adequately empowered Civilian Police Commission, would we be seeing this lawsuit now? Such an oversight board, as proposed by POPC, would have received the plaintiff’s disturbing complaints when filed, and might have even acted as a deterrent against officers who believe they might get away with the crimes alleged in the lawsuit because their buddies on the force can be counted on to tip them off if someone is complaining about them.