Archives for category: 65th Assembly District
Make up your own caption..

Can you fabricate a campaign for me?

Given the desperation of the Republicans to prevent another Democratic supermajority in the California Assembly, it is remarkable how weak a candidate they have fielded in their effort to unseat 65th Assembly Member Sharon Quirk-Silva. With virtually no pedigree other than two decades as an aide to Congressman-for-life Ed Royce, Jr., Young Kim is evidently the best thing the GOP could come up with to challenge the former Fullerton Councilmember and Mayor. One has to wonder how, with all of their resources, the Republicans couldn’t find an experienced local elected official to back in such a crucial election. Instead, the power of the Ed Royce, in a move reminiscent of George W. Bush nominating Harriet Meirs to the Supreme Court, has thrust forth an unknown and inexperienced political insider—and somehow it has become a head-to-head race anyway.

Sharon Quirk-Silva has become something like the Barack Obama of her district. Without being anything close to a progressive left wing legislator, she is nonetheless intensely disliked by conservatives. Her surprise upset of incumbent Chris Norby was no doubt helped by cross over Republicans who didn’t mind seeing the former County Supervisor and Fullerton Mayor and Councilmember sent packing after achieving his ultimate political goal of ending Redevelopment in California. But now, with Mr. Norby safely gone, Republicans can throw out Ms. Quirk-Silva in favor of a nobody with nothing to say in the form of Young Kim.

It’s not a good idea to side with political mailers, but the Quirk-Silva campaign has it right to point out that Young Kim claims to be a businesswoman, but has no income from her consulting “business,” and that she “moved into” the district to run here, having previously resided in La Habra. Carpetbagging is its own special form of insincerity, but some voters just look the other way sometimes, even when it is obvious that the candidate doesn’t really even live in the new home they claim as their residence (think Linda Ackerman in 2009).

...and here is where I'll pretend to live so I can run for Assembly.

…and here is where I’ll pretend to live so I can run for Assembly.

I know many Republicans, and it is hard for me to imagine most of them having much enthusiasm for Young Kim or her hollow, predictable campaign rhetoric. It is not hard for me to imagine them voting for her, though, because, above all, she is not Sharon Quirk-Silva, the Democrat, who capitalized on the last redrawing of Assembly districts that created a 65th with roughly even numbers of Republican and Democrats, and enough of the ever-growing “Decline to State” voters to narrowly swing things her way in 2012.

Young Kim’s strategy has been to attack Sharon Quirk-Silva for supposedly threatening Proposition 13, the sacred cow of California politics that created a terribly uneven property tax structure for homeowners, and for voting in favor of a bill that allowed children to choose the school bathroom they wanted to use based on their self-identified gender. When you have nothing to say, say it as often as possible and hope it sounds like something, or so I assume is the tactic of the Young Kim campaign’s repetitive mailers, which have spawned endless counter-mailers from the Quirk-Silva camp. The Rag household received a record eleven in a single day. Honestly, it’s tiresome to even write about a campaign so void of character and meaning when there are so many important things a real candidate should be saying at a time like this.

fracking-feat

Image stolen from KCET.

The Fullerton City Council will once again consider adopting the 2014 version of its Legislative Platform on Tuesday night, May 6. Despite public calls for the City Council to support statewide legislation moratorium on the practice of hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking, and acidizing of wells, neither term is anywhere to be found in the proposed document.

As a bill to impose a statewide fracking moratorium, winds its way through committees in Sacramento, Fullerton should be monitoring its progress, and be prepared to support it*. In its current state, SB 1132 cites many important reasons for a fracking ban:

“(1) The state has failed to appropriately monitor or track well stimulation activity and to study its effects.

(2) Well stimulation and well stimulation-related activities release harmful air pollutants, including methanol, crystalline silica dust, hydrochloric and hydrofluoric acid, xylene, 2-butoxyethanol, naphthalene, ethylbenzene, 2-propanol, volatile organic compounds, and particulate matter, which have an adverse impact on the state’s air quality and are detrimental to public health and safety. Many parts of California already suffer from poor air quality.

(3) Well stimulation and well stimulation-related activities involve the use of hundreds of chemicals, many of which are known to be carcinogenic or are otherwise harmful to human health. These chemicals, along with dangerous chemicals present in the oil and gas formation, threaten to contaminate groundwater and surface water resources through numerous potential pathways.

(4) Exposure to the chemicals used in well stimulation and well stimulation-related activities poses a widespread and significant risk to public health and safety and the environment. Studies have shown an increase in birth defects and illnesses in communities located close to well stimulation operations.

(5) Well stimulation and well stimulation-related activities involve the use of substantial amounts of freshwater, which cannot be reused for other purposes once it is mixed with well stimulation fluid chemicals. California is currently experiencing one of the worst droughts in the state’s history and faces a scarcity of freshwater resources.

(6) Well stimulation and well stimulation-related activities result in the emission of a substantial amount of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane. The construction, drilling, extraction, refinement, and end-use combustion of oil and gas produce vast amounts of greenhouse gas. Furthermore, well stimulation and well stimulation-related activities may lead to a dramatic increase in the overall amount of recoverable oil and gas in the state. The expansion of oil and gas activity and the process of well stimulation both threaten to undermine the state’s goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

(7) The disposal of wastewater resulting from well stimulation and well stimulation-related activities in other states has been linked to increased earthquake activity.

(8) Fracking and other forms of well stimulation occur disproportionately near communities consisting largely of people of color, low-income households, non-English-speaking households, and persons already experiencing high levels of water or air pollution or water scarcity.

(9) Well stimulation and well stimulation-related activities directly and indirectly harm wildlife, including species that are protected under federal and state endangered species laws.

(b) It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this act to protect the public health and welfare of the state.”

Numbers 5 and 7 above should be understood to be particularly relevant to residents of Fullerton. The recent earthquake and its seemlingly endless aftershocks could be connected to fracking. Seismic activity and fracking have been linked in other areas of the country, leading to moratoriums on the practice.

Fullerton is fortunate to have ground water wells from which to draw a significant portion of its drinking water. Concrete wastewater injection well linings can eventually break down. Chemicals can leach into groundwater, ruining the most precious resource we have. Is it really worth the risk to extract the last stubborn remnants of oil and gas at a time when we know that burning them will lead to increased warming in the atmosphere, and when renewable energy strategies become cheaper every day?

The people of Fullerton should be very disturbed by the omission of a statewide fracking moratorium in the city’s proposed Legislative Agenda. Our City Council should throw its weight behind legislation to stop fracking in Califiornia. Sidestepping the issue is not acceptable.

 

 

*One wonders why our Assembly representative Sharon Quirk-Silva has made no mention of SB 1132 or the subject of fracking. Telephone calls, emails, and in-person questions to her staff from the Rag have gone completely unanswered. Readers can draw their own conclusions.

 

FrackingWastePit_BGS_WEB

Our drinking water could be at risk.

One vitally important issue left entirely out of Fullerton’s pending Legislative Platform, to be considered tonight, is support for state legislation imposing a statewide moratorium on hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking”, of oil and gas wells. Fracking has been linked to both groundwater contamination and earthquakes, and should be entirely banned as a method of fossil fuel extraction. The process, which involves injecting wells with unknown chemicals at high pressure to cause fissures, freeing deep deposits of gas and oil, also uses huge amounts of water our state can’t afford to waste.

There is already a nationwide grassroots movement to ban the practices of acidizing and fracking.

Ohio recently declared local moratoriums on fracking after its Dept. of Natural Resources declared that there was probably a link between the process and the occurance of earthquakes near drilling sites. Closer to home, the City Council of Carson, CA voted unanimously last month to place a temporary ban on all new oil and gas drilling amid worries that fracking might be used to drill there. The City of Los Angeles has already banned the practices of fracking and acidizing of wells.

North Orange County residents are already asking whether or not the recent La Habra earthquake and it’s seemingly endless aftershocks were caused by fracking in the oil fields near its epicenter. While it is true that earthquakes are hardly a rarity in Calfironia, and that oil tends to be found near faultlines, it is not unreasonable to declare a moritorium on fracking in the city until we can find out for sure whether or not there is a connection. Let’s also lend our support to a statewide moritorium.

The Fullerton City Council’s 2014 Legislative Agenda should include strong support for Senate Bill 1132, which would institute a moritorium on fracking. The bill was approved, albeit narrowly, by the Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee last week. Our state representatives, Assembly member Sharon Quirk-Silva and State Senator Bob Huff should be prepared to support this legislation, and our City Council should be there to back them up.

Chemical laden water is routinley pumped back into the ground to dispose of wastewater from fracking. Fullerton is lucky to have groundwater to supply much of our drinking water needs. Chemicals migrating from aging concrete lined wells, which ultimately fail over decades, could contaminate our drinking water, causing a catastrophe for the city. It is simply not worth the risk to allow drillers to extract the last deposits of fossil fuel from fields that have already been producing for the better part of a century.