It’s been five days since the OC Weekly’s Gabriel San Roman broke the news of the most recent lawsuit against the Fullerton Police Department. The suit accuses a now former Detective from the FPD of coercing sex from a woman in exchange for favorable testimony in the woman’s custody case. The suit also alleges that other FPD officers tipped off the detective to an attempted anonymous complaint by the plaintiff, and alleges that the detective threatened the plaintiff as a result. We don’t know if any of these accusations are true, but one would think that the county’s only daily newspaper would have noticed the story by now.
The Orange County Register found the time to publish a story about a new anti-loitering ordinance just adopted by the City Council, and one about the new, expensive body cameras Fullerton Police officers will now be required to wear, but nothing at all about allegations that an FPD detective may have done some seriously ugly and abusive things to a woman, or about how much money it could cost the city in damages paid to her if a jury decides in her favor.
Late last year the Rag pondered the relationship between Cornerstone Communications, a public relations firm that counts the City of Fullerton as one of its clients, and the OC Register. Cornerstone Communications provides police-friendly stories under the heading Behind the Badge OC to the OC Register, content that used to appear on the now defunct website Fullerton Police News. In that 2012 story we wondered how much Fullerton’s taxpayers were paying a PR firm to write positive stories about our own police department to have spoon fed back to us online and in print. Well, it’s even worse if serious stories about the police are being ignored because the Register relies on this PR firm for some of its coverage of the subject, because you can bet that Behind the Badge OC won’t have much to say about the lawsuit.
Good question. I would also like to know if the DA investigated these charges, or if they plan to do so now in light of this report.
LikeLike
Realizing that allegations in civil lawsuits shouldn’t simply be taken at face value, I spent some time on this yesterday, including spending some time on the phone with the D.A’s office. The short answer: Yes, the D.A. investigated the case “thoroughly” (Their word, not mine) and found there “was no evidence to support a finding of criminal conduct against the officer.”
LikeLike
Coming from the same DA who routinely clears police officers of wrongdoing unless they’re caught on video? The same DA who refuses to prosecute candidates who use false addresses to run for office? Even if the accusations in the suit are all completely untrue, isn’ the filing itself deserving of a story in the Register?
LikeLike
He’s not called the Do-Nothing D.A. for, uh, nothing.
LikeLike
This DA?
http://m.voiceofoc.org/county/article_991db9da-4417-11e4-a04f-cf762506bdde.html?mode=jqm
LikeLike
Hey Lou,
Doesn’t this sound all to familiar to you from the last time the FPD was accused of groping women?
Get a freaking clue!
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/oct/03/local/la-me-fullerton-cops-20111004
LikeLike
Lou:
“No evidence” is a strange choice of words — if the Plaintiff signed a declaration attesting to the conduct alleged in the Weekly article there’s the evidence of criminal conduct right there. The evidence might not have been credible, but it is still evidence.
As to the credibility, the DA should be able to discuss the nature of their investigation with you. Were there any third parties interviewed? Was the Plaintiff (or Detective)’s story inconsistent in some capacity? Was there any physical evidence proving or disproving the allegations? Did the officer deny any sexual contact at all, or did the DA conclude any contact was consensual? Also, there were allegations made about the manner in which the complaint was handled by the department — were those charges investigated?
I look forward to reading your article. Send me an email when it comes out. Thanks.
LikeLike
I can testy to the fact that Ron Blair is a first class twat. This guy tried to intimidate me at a city council meeting once. He was part of a cluster **** at the door and to me it felt like he refused to move out of my way once I was done speaking and was trying to exit. It was pretty lame and not much of an intimidation to be honest but he appeared to be blocking the door to the lobby so I could not pass. I can’t remember for sure, but I don’t believe I realized he was a cop at the time. After a few seconds of weaving and saying excuse me I ended up just pushing my way past his comb over. This of course does not mean that he is a rapist, but he is an asshole. Since all rapist are assholes, we know that he has at least that in common with them 🙂
LikeLike