Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk-Silva’s re-election campaign has challenged the ballot designation submitted by her only opponent, Republican Young Kim of La Habra. According to an OC Register story by veteran political writer Martin Wisckol, Ms. Kim listed her occupation as “Small Businesswoman,” claiming that she “reactivated” a consulting business after leaving the employ of Congressman Ed Royce, Jr.’s office, where she had served as an aide for twenty years.
Ballot designations can be a crucial factor in deciding who wins a race. Voters are notoriously lazy, and often choose a candidate based on little more than an occupation listed next to their name. “Small Business Woman” sounds much better than “Director of Community Relations and Asian Affairs” Ret. (although candidates are limited to only three words) when one is running on a platform to make California “business-friendly so businesses can grow and create jobs.”
The Quirk-Silva campaign reportedly objected to the “Small Business Woman” designation submitted by Ms. Kim because her “financial disclosures filed last week show no income from her business and that it has no website.” Mr. Wiskol goes on to report that Young Kim’s “political consultant Dave Gilliard countered that she legally established the business last year and started making money from it only this year.”
For twenty years someone is a political insider, but then leaves government work for the private sector just before running for a seat in the California State Assembly, but makes no money the first year as a consultant? Not the best record for a candidate from a political party that ostensibly values small government and respects business acumen.
Of course, anyone who casts a vote based only on a ballot designation deserves whatever they get in office, but candidates should also be as forthright as possible when representing their primary occupation to the electorate.
Nice post, Matt. Very nice.
I’m sure her clients wouldn’t mind offering their endorsement of her work. Seems reasonable, right?
LikeLike
Lots of businesses, hundreds, thousands, make nothing, or lose money, the first year possibly longer, so what’s the big deal? It’ll take more than her to make Calif. business friendly. Calif. voters, and national voters for that matter, absolutely deserve what they get and lately it’s not much, Obama care, militarized police that seem to think they’re still in a war zone, and shoot unarmed, innocent anybody, jails where jailers beat to death or hang inmates, politicians who take bribes among other things, taxes that are so high that businesses leave for Texas or other states that are business friendly, on and on. So what’s the big deal if she calls herself a small business woman? Assume she gets elected, she’s got to be better than Q-S anybody would be. But still she’ll be a politician, and as I’ve always said, you can always tell a politician’s lying, their lips are moving. -30-
LikeLike
“Political Hack” could be a pretty good occupation to list on the ballot. People might actually vote for it.
LikeLike
Just a thought, but instead of bickering’ how about justifying some of your views? There are a plethora of Voters unfamiliar with either cadidate. I personally don’t know of an election in the past 60 years that wasn’t a case of the lesser of 2 or 3 evils, so lets hear why your choice for this office is less putrid than the other(s). Convince me why I should cast my ballot in this race instead of leaving it blank and not voting for anyone.
LikeLike
I think you should leave it blank, when it comes to the partisan offices, because “third” parties were excluded by the effects of Prop 14, but that’s just me.
LikeLike