Last Tuesday Bruce Whitaker hosted the November edition of his Talk Around Town series at the Fullerton Arboretum, his last as Mayor of Fullerton in 2013. Fullerton’s City Council chooses a Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem from amongst themselves on a rotational basis each December. It is likely that different mayor will be chosen at the December 3 City Council meeting.
Mayor Whitaker reflected on his time as a resident in Fullerton during the 1990’s, when he and others became politically active to oppose a proposed utility tax. He said that he was raised in a small town in the midwest, and that, although he had lived in Fullerton for some time, the city didn’t really feel like home to him until he got together with other residents to take action against the new tax. This organizing ultimately led to the 1994 recall of three council members who had voted to impose the new tax.
Politics is a dirty word in the United States. The 1994 recall was so divisive that prominent community members cited it as reason alone to oppose the second recall in Fullerton’s history in 2012. It’s difficult to imagine a recall election not being divisive. A more constructive course would be to build a culture of consensus where disagreements might be resolved, at least partially, before pursuing such extreme electoral measures, but individual actions and institutional structures sometimes make it nearly impossible to do so.
We have a winner-take-all system for our council elections instead of a ranked ballot voting system that would eliminate spoilers and better reflect the will of the voters. Far too much money is spent maligning or promoting candidates in crass or simplistic ways. Special interests pour resources into campaigns to ensure benefits to a relatively small number of people rather than considering what is best for the whole community.
The City Council itself utilizes Robert’s Rules of Order when they might instead adopt a more inclusive consensus seeking process. But seeking consensus through dialogue should be something residents themselves do on a continuing basis, and not just when an issue comes before our City Council or an election approaches. The politics of joy and justice can rise from the community if we build a more inclusive and respectful political culture from the ground up.
Matt, not having been there back in the first recall days I think you missed the point that the council at the time were not going to listen to anyone in the public. Over 700 people showed up at that City Council meeting and said “do not raise my taxes” and the council still voted it in. Our committee studied the budget and came up with several ideas to cut the budget and they just laughed at us saying that we, the peons could never understand a budget. Funny how wrong they were. After the recall, the taxes were repealed, by the new council. I believe it was 6 utilities in all. To this day, we were proved right that the city could do without those taxes being raised.
Bruce also told about the first tax fight he and the Committees of Correspondence led against the County before that. Making the elected(s) accountable for budgeting instead of just taxing the citizens to make up for their (the County) mistakes.
Not only are recall elections divisive, so are regular elections. This last election being the most divisive I remember. I think it will be the same this next election year. Recalls are started by passionate people who believe in having their say and if the elected(s) do not follow the will of the citizens then maybe it is time for the elected(s) to move on/retire/etc. Unfortunately most elected(s) cannot see this. They have forgotten that they serve the public.
Change can be good. No one owns a seat forever.
Thanks to you and Jane for joining us on Tuesday.
LikeLike
LInda, I certainly didn’t mean to imply that there was anything wrong with a recall. Sometimes it’s the only recourse we have. I wholeheartedly supported the last one. I guess what I meant to say in my little Thanksgiving Day homily was that it would be nice if the community could have a deeper dialogue about these issues before they ever get to the council level. I was inspired by the conversation Tuesday night about the College Town plan. It was obvious that despite all of the city’s efforts, residents were still frustrated with the process.
Even council election forums are hampered by a format that never allows for a dialogue between the candidates. I think we need real debates and a monthly forum to discuss important issues.
LikeLike